Agree on scope and safe access
We confirm the product goal, repositories, environments, review boundaries, access method, confidentiality, price, and delivery date in writing.
No repository access is requested until the scope is clear.
For independent founders
Built with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or another AI coding tool? We compare the product you intended with the code that exists, identify the risks in priority order, and give you a fix plan you can use without starting over.
A review you can act on
The review covers the whole product, whether AI wrote the code, the product uses AI, or both. Model optimization is one part of the review, not the assumption behind it.
We confirm the product goal, repositories, environments, review boundaries, access method, confidentiality, price, and delivery date in writing.
No repository access is requested until the scope is clear.
We inspect authentication, permissions, secrets, customer-data boundaries, database behavior, payments, webhooks, backups, infrastructure, and model calls where present.
Every finding includes evidence, severity, impact, and a recommended action.
You receive a plain-language priority plan with effort estimates and a founder walkthrough of the findings.
Use the plan yourself, give it to another engineer, or ask Olib AI to scope the fixes separately.
If the product itself uses AI
Some tasks need a general model. Others are safer and cheaper with ordinary code, search, or a small model trained for one narrow job. We recommend the simplest option that meets the product requirement.
The first call confirms fit. Before any repository access, we agree on scope, access, confidentiality, price, delivery date, and what the final review will contain. Implementation is always a separate decision.